Urban Entity Resolution
Possible duplicate parcel records · District 7
Non-action commitment
Every output is presented to a named human reviewer and never reaches a downstream system on its own.
Review commitment
This system does not execute municipal action. It only prepares evidence-backed recommendations for authorized human review. Every decision creates an audit log entry.
Case summary
Two parcel records share the same plot reference. Addresses and owners differ. Reviewer approval needed before any merge.
Category
Parcel reconciliation
Recommended next step
Surface candidate group to data steward for accept · reject · defer.
Workflow steps
01
Match candidates
Surface candidate record groupings with confidence indicators and the fields that drove the grouping.
02
Reviewer decision
Reviewer accepts, rejects, or defers each grouping. No record is merged without explicit approval.
Decision Intelligence · KW-001
Projection only · no engine call
- What happened
- Two parcel records share the same plot reference. Addresses and owners differ. Reviewer approval needed before any merge.
- Why it surfaced
- Aged inspection request flagged by triage view; evidence packet partially complete; capture-date gap on 1 attachment(s).
- Evidence used
- ev-001
- Visual evidence used
- —
- Human review point
- Reviewer C · Data Steward (human review required)
- Audit proof
- —
- Operational value
- Reviewer reaches the case with full source-logged context and a recorded rationale, raising audit readiness for the district portfolio.
- Next step
- Surface candidate group to data steward for accept · reject · defer.
Linked evidence
1 items- High
ev-001 · municipal_registry
Parcel registry export · District 7
Two parcel records share the same plot reference; addresses differ.
Captured: 2026-04-09
Reviewer decision
Every decision creates an audit entryCase audit trail
Full audit log →No audit entries yet.